Sunday, July 14, 2013

The impact of what we say


 776: 

As an animal advocate, I try never to get nasty or insistent. The seriousness of the (animal) issue isn’t necessarily shared by everyone, so I keep any coups de grace tucked up my sleeve, in reserve. However, we can’t avoid the details of the issues involved, however ugly they may be. We have a duty to pass the truth about animal husbandry onto those who know too little about it. The details are important and it’s these details people don’t know about. Or say they don’t.
If I do get the chance to say something, what should I mention? There’s so much to say but it’s a matter of timing - the more impact we make the greater the risk of shocking, or then being totally rejected.
But if I ever do get to the details, here are three areas I think are worth expanding on:
1. Sentience - there’s a similarity between humans and animals, in the way we each feel and suffer pain. Even fish have a similar nervous system to ours, so when they are dragged out of their water-world and left to suffocate, they’re often crushed to death by the weight of other fish, piled on top of them. Ordinarily, fish suffocate in the air over a period of twenty minutes, a detail lost to most anglers. Whether creatures die on decks of boats or in abattoirs, every one of them suffers a terrible death. Each of us (who eat them) plays our part in these deaths. The ultimate detail is held in just one number – 250 – the number of animals the average person is responsible for putting to death, the number they consume, in one year.
2. Human health - the long-term health effects of ingesting animal products is not fully realised by people until it’s too late. The foods and chemicals fed to farm animals, together with the fatty, high protein content of the food itself, makes animal-based foods unsafe, health-wise. The Animal Industries wouldn’t agree, of course.
3. Environmental impact - animal farming isn’t good for the environment, with soil erosion, waste run-off and emissions of greenhouse gas. And, the food fed to animals which are then fed to humans is a highly inefficient waste of energy. It is more efficient for humans to be fed directly from plants. This waste is an insult to the millions of people around the world who are starving for lack of any sort of protein.
For all these reasons this subject is rarely talked about. Clouds of obfuscation wash over this subject so that none of the important details ever get discussed, since discussion of them is regarded  as a social taboo. By not allowing free discussion and by pretending the problem doesn’t exist, we erode one of our most valued freedoms – free-speech. You and I might disagree about Animal Rights but, if we never have the chance to discuss it, we end up having a much bigger problem on our hands. If we aren’t free to learn new things or talk about certain things what does that say about us? That we are frightened of the truth coming out? If we’re silent on this subject we are voiceless, just as the animals are. And that would be embarrassing, to stay quiet when we should be exercising our freedom to speak out.
Our animal slaves on the farms have no freedom. I think that needs to be talked about and objected to. We’ve taken their lives away from them so they have no reason to live.

While animals can’t do anything about their loss of freedom, we humans can, since we have freedom of thought and personal decision. But even for a free-thinking vegan, how much right do I have to speak freely when this subject is so off-limits. I’m expected to skim over the surface but never to touch on any significant details. I can’t get ‘down to it’ with omnivores because I know how touchy this whole matter is for them. 

No comments: