1097:
If energy is a problem, it’s
only a problem if there’s not enough of it. Maybe we have to start considering
energy not as a finite resource, like having so much petrol in the tank, but more
like a self-perpetuating substance. It’s the way in which it’s used that
determines whether it can generate any replacement energy, this being based on
the idea that the more you put out, the more of it comes back.
Shall we say, this energy,
used for the greater good, is the sort that can stimulate the making of energy.
As soon as we’re doing what we consider to be meaningful work we unconsciously expand
our energy. Or, to be brief, this energy expands as it expends.
Let’s say that acts of
usefulness or kindness, where there’s a fairly big energy investment on our
part, show less overall energy depletion than expected. Perhaps well-intentioned
activism uses the sort of energy where the more of it we use the more is replaced.
In our line of work this
would need to be so, because we can’t forget the conditions animal activists
have to work under. There’s an in-built drain on our motivational energy simply
because of the sheer weight of opposition we face, by the denigration of our
values, being ignored and probably even being thought stupid for having these
values in the first place.
But ultimately these are only
the small drawbacks of the ‘job’. As activists, we’re operating on several
fronts at the same time, holding ourselves together whilst carrying on doing
what we are doing without being put-off.
One important part of our ‘job’,
as activists, is to learn how to handle the minority-ness of our work. And part
of that is learning how to handle people with the mentality of doing what they
want to, without any hindrance. Should we hinder? Should we observe? It’s still
open to question which approach to take.
On the plus side, for us, there’s
a surprise-energy, which pops up from time to time. I think it comes from self
regard, nothing more - who better to be motivating us but our very selves, when
we’re tingling with something we’ve done that we’re proud of. We say to
ourselves, “Okay, good-one”. The reason this energy seems to appears from
nowhere is down to us letting go of self interest. Could it be that when energy is released for
the ‘greater-good’ that we set off a chain reaction? For instance, as soon as we begin to take an
interest in a forest, an animal, a human or any important issue, the energy we need
will appear from nowhere? The opposite can happen too, where self-interest
drains energy, as we see when there’s an insatiable thirst for more, and the
harder one tries to pick up energy the more it drains away and slows things
up.
If energy works like this, (for
example, harmful energy sources like meat eventually depleting our energy, whereas
harmless, life-giving sources of energy, like plants, building energy) it puts
a new spin on things - that however hard pressed we feel there’s always enough
energy left over for meaningful activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment