1171:
Everyone and everything wants
a life, but humans deny domesticated animals just that. And by the way, they also deny them affection,
and we do nothing to ease the pain of their terrible deaths.
If we humans can’t see the
wrongness in any of this, there’s probably a reason - it’s likely that we’ve
learnt to bypass our guilt because of our strong urge, as members of our
society, to conform. If we didn’t conform,
there’d be anarchy and insecurity.
But on the matter of what we
put in our mouths, we should all be more circumspect. We trust the food manufacturers and rarely ask
what they are putting into their foods. We
accept what we’re told, that their food is safe. And then there’s the ethical
question - whether we should be eating products from enslaved animals.
Don’t go looking to Society
for answers. Farm animals have been stitched up by humans - we’ve made special
laws that outlaw cruelty to dogs and cats but which makes it okay to abuse ‘food-animals’.
Farmers can’t be punished for what they
do to them and consumers aren’t doing anything illegal by sponsoring the farms.
If the law is on our side, so too is there
a psychological safety in numbers - we all take part in the abuse, we all spend
our money on Animal Industry products. When we’ve been doing the same thing all
our lives, and see everyone else doing the same, we don’t question what we are
doing, how we are living.
Our failsafe in all this is
supposed to be our own personal ethics, conscience and intelligence. Supposedly these functions stop us in our
tracks, and urge us to start questioning. But our cravings and senses push us on. They
tug at us like any temptation, “I really, really want ... those shoes, that
steak, that chocolate”. Which is why the Animal Industries do so well out of
us. They play on our ‘temptatious-ness’,
and thus keep themselves in business.
What it boils down to is this:
they can continue attacking animals without fear of the law or fear of causing
public concern. It seems that we humans may attack animals as we wish - animals
can never pose any direct threat to us. And if they can’t retaliate, there’s no
reason why we can’t exploit them up to the hilt. After all, animals were ‘put here’ for us to
use!
Animals make profits for
farmers, drug company, wholesalers and retailers. As a society, we allow the Industry to shaft
the animals because it pleases us to do so. Our protective gene is switched off, and a new
belief creed begins to ring true -indifference. Saying, “Animals don’t have the sort of feelings that
we humans do”, suggesting animals are no
different to machines. And as machines, we don’t have to feel anything for
them. They aren’t like our pets at home. They MUST have no feelings like that.
There would be big trouble if
we treated our dogs as we do pigs. If we
did to our cat what we do our hens. The
RSPCA would get involved. They’d make
sure enough TV cameras were rolling, to expose us.
It’s not-okay to hurt cats. Stories of ‘cruelty to cats’ usually make big news, but
what about ‘cruelty to farm animals’? What is the
difference between a mistreated dog and a mistreated cow? Why aren’t we interested in the cow’s
emotional wellbeing? Why don’t we care
about a hen’s health, unless it affects her ‘egg production’? And more to the point, why aren’t we concerned
for ourselves, for what we are getting ourselves
involved with? Why can’t we make
the connection between the numbing of our collective conscience and our present
fall from grace? Why do we do these
terrible things to animals, and all for such slim pickings? Are we looking at a spoilt-brat attitude,
that insists that, “I must have milk on my corn flakes, or it just be right”.
No comments:
Post a Comment