860:
I think the art of talking about this subject is in looking
a bit vulnerable. I don’t mean deceptively so, just as long as we don’t try to speak
from the pulpit. Even though we can’t stand the idea of murdering animals for
meat, we have to accept that there are different points of view about this, and we ought to know what those views are before
trying to present counter arguments. Otherwise what we say will go in one ear
and out the other
I think the
omnivore that it might take a very long time for
cruelty to food animals to mean very much, when it’s weighed against food
sensation and its instant gratification. The taste-sensation, the stomach-filling,
the crunch and bite and ooze, the salt, the blood-taste, the sugar-hit –
they’re all connected with a familiar oral pleasure that has been developing
all our lives.. It’s perhaps the most powerful external-internal interface we
know. It’s not only associated with satisfying hunger and therefore easing the
fear of starvation, but it’s also associated with rich living which eases the
fear of feeling poor and worthless (as if we are not even worth feeding).
Loving what we love to eat is not a casual time-passing activity, it’s
what stays pretty much at the forefront of the mind all the time. Just one
little twinge of feeling peckish and there’s a need to satisfy that slightly
empty feeling, and indulge all the choices of taste sensation. One small setback
in our day and we compensate with a snack, a favourite savoury or sweet treat.
The omnivore will not discriminate along ethical lines, if it’s animal or
non-animal doesn’t matter. The only important factor is that taste buds need
appeasing and the body and mind need calming.
So
giving up any of this instant pleasure would seem like unnecessary
self-punishment. Why would anyone choose to do without what is so available,
for the sake of animals? One would have to be crazy or masochistic. Apart from
becoming healthier, (and most young people feel themselves to be immune to ill
health) why would anyone give a plant-based diet even a moment of serious
consideration?
Bearing
all this in mind, I’d suggest that, for the activist vegan, emotion should
give way to determination, and urgency to patience, if only because the
omnivore is nowhere near ready to be led to our views yet. Our frustration is a
difficulty for us, and it’s hard for us to not expect to se much progress. But
it’s important that we hang in there and develop an optimistic patience. And
withal, we might need to get used to the absence of positive feedback.
It shouldn’t surprise us that the
average omnivore probably thinks we are either crazy
or masochistic. We need to be like the parent who provides interesting
meals for the family but who doesn’t expect the kids to compliment them on
their cooking. That they grow up well fed is all that can be expected; and it’s
the same with our efforts to enlighten people about animals. It might sink in on
a subtle level without the need for direct agreement or approval.
As activists and advocates we
might need a better understanding of the scale
of the change we want to see. To bring people across to our view, that animals
shouldn’t be exploited, we have to realise it’s a more radical attitude change
than anything attempted before.
To recap: animals are slaves and our
aim is to bring that to an end. Angry we might be, but determined activists
have to be in it for the long haul. We don’t need to fly any flags or keep
hitting people with ‘the truth’. Our job isn’t to bore them or lecture them. We
mustn’t go on about being vegan if that just gets people’s back up, and inhibit
them. We want them to hear what we say and then go home to consider things
we’ve said. We mustn’t make them feel so uncomfortable that they’ll go home and
open the fridge for some crap-food to make them feel better, to help them forget us.
When omnivores do agree with us
they’ll often do it in the hope of shutting us up. The more praise they shower
on us (saying how much they admire us for the ‘stand’ we’re making) the more
they hope to calm us down, in order t be rid of us (before we ‘go too far’).
Whether for a good cause or a
selfish one, the more we want admiration from others the less we’ll get it.
When we seem to impress people by shocking them with the facts, we may not be
impressing them at all. Their seemingly positive feed-back may just be
politeness, to please us. People won’t become vegan out of politeness.
No comments:
Post a Comment