Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Agreeing to disagree

785: 

Animal Rights isn’t a subject which comes up casually in conversation. Most people studiously avoid it, which is why we need to find ways to bring it up without being too ‘over the top’ about it. It’s much easier if we are aiming to discuss the welfare of farm animals. It’s much harder if we aim to talk about the wrongness of using-animals altogether.
Of course, since most people use animals for food and clothing it isn’t likely they’d immediately swing our way and agree with us about this ‘wrongness’, especially of animal-based foods. Even less likely agree about co-products like leather or by-products like milk. There are too many reasons why most people are reluctant to talk about any of this, whereas vegans do want to. We feel an urgency to talk about it.
I see the destiny of the world linked to this very subject, because there are so many global problems I would associate with animal farming. So, it comes down to this: your reluctance versus my eagerness.
            I don’t regard this as some cosy subject for intellectual debate, or a subject we can politely agree to disagree about. The bare bones of the way I see it is civilised-human versus barbaric-human. You might not agree. So, whatever outrageous thing I might say, it just seems to you that I’m attacking the ways of the world.

            Two opposite views concerning the right humans have to use animals. 

No comments: