Monday, April 24, 2017

Consistent Ethics


1965:

Most people think that we can only be effective if we have specialist knowledge, but what expertise is needed to know that the animal business is wrong and to keep well clear of it? When something isn’t right we know it in our gut. It comes from intuition and inborn values. A familiar comment from new vegans is, “Why didn’t I see it before?”



From my own experience, as soon as I tap into instinct, things become clearer, and then I’m more likely to gravitate towards ‘the greater good’, if only because it seems so obvious. What counts, I think, is optimism and faith, and you can’t sustain much of that if you are hanging around the gates of the abattoir, figuratively speaking. Following convention without questioning it, eating food which we haven’t examined ethically, eating rubbish foods, none of this bodes well for the future.



When any of us choose to NOT buy something we want, stopping ourselves for ethical reasons, we make an important statement. We say, for instance with animal food, that we can’t eat what shouldn’t even exist - namely foods associated with animals.



This is one way we can exercise self-control, by setting an example. But if we do that in one field and not in another equally important field, we lose credibility. Concern for animals requires that we are also concerned for the land. It’s the same problem we have in any area of advancement, whether it’s our career, lifestyle, relationships or spiritual progress. By neglecting any one vital issue, simply because it doesn’t suit our convenience, we introduce an incompleteness or inconsistency into our life, and that surely leads to double standards.

         

In the end, if we can’t muster sufficient personal power, to change any faulty parts of our own daily existence, then our personal authority will drop off. And without that feeling, we can’t fight corruption or change the system we live in.

No comments: