755:
I’m suggesting, especially for long term activists, that the
good old standby of ‘shock-horror’-protest needs a fresh look. Maybe in the
past it’s been a lot of fun, out on protests, with mates, screaming about the
horrors of animal abuse – completely valid. But it’s cost us a lot too, since with
our overdose of aggro we’ve trashed our credibility to some extent.
Perhaps it felt good to protest
this way, it felt ‘right’ and justified. But now I’d suggest there’s a more
sophisticated, ‘cooler’ way to talk to ‘the other side’. I think we have to
find a way of becoming less emotional about this subject, because once there’s
a voice-tone there usually comes a germ of disapproval, even dislike in our
voice, then whatever we say is sure to be rejected. I’ve experienced all the
rejections - I’m a hypocrite, I have double standards, I’m poorly-informed. When
what I’ve been saying is challenged with overtones of personal attack, that upsets
me, and I get angry, quarrelsome, even abusive until I fall nicely into the
trap that’s been set for me. By sounding and looking like thunder I fail to impress
the very people I set out to impress.
No comments:
Post a Comment