659:
If I were new to veganism, even if I couldn’t get over my
own keyed-up feelings (about the cruelty to animals) there’d be a side-worry.
It would concern health and vegan diets, with me asking myself if it was safe
and if a vegan diet was efficacious.
As omnivores, food and nutrition
always involves lots of animal products. In my own past that’s all I knew, that
animal protein was essential and healthy. It would have seemed reckless to consider
any diet that didn’t include them, in fact suicidal to go against the ‘obvious
truth’, that animal-produce makes for healthy living. I’d have said that an
omnivorous diet had been tried and tested as a diet suitable for humans over millenniums, and that the good
sense of it was therefore almost written in stone.
But eventually I came to consider
there had always been an element of Hobson’s Choice about this, and considered
too the possibility that this had been propaganda, and that we all believed
this way because no living race of people on earth had ever seriously
considered a totally plant-based diet. Nor had any of us considered our food in
terms of ethics with good nutrition. I eventually also realised that there is a
time and a place for every good idea, and that up to then it hadn’t been the
right time for the emergence of that sort of consciousness.
Now things have changed, times
have changed. This is not the hungry 1940s in the West. We are seventy years
on. Plant-based diets have been tested
and not found wanting (except for the need for supplementation of vitamin B12).
We are also some forty years on from the 1970s when speciesism was first
introduced as a concept. Perhaps in the 1950s, for a world starved by war,
there had been an excuse to delay the adoption of plant-based diets, but that
was half a century ago. Now, we are, attitudinally-speaking, in an entirely
different position. We can regard food in a different way. Here in the West we
have never known what it’s like to feel hungry or even to have no food in the
house. Since the end of that war-torn period people in the developed world have
always had enough food, and we’ve been able to look more closely at what ‘food’
really is. And surprise, surprise, we’ve found that so much of the food we’ve
been fed is both crap and cruelly-produced. Now we have to look at food in a
different way.
You’ve got to have great respect
for those brave people who, in the early 1940’s, started to question what
they’d been told about food. They dared to buck the system, and out of this has
come what we now call ‘the vegan diet’. It liberates the conscience, boycotts
the cruelty and outlines healthy nutrition all at the same time.
The nutritional side of
plant-based diets has been elevated to respectability by research. Eminent
authorities now give their tick of approval to plant-based food regimes. The
nutritional side of things is no longer a worry. Indeed it is highly beneficial
to health, but let’s not get into that here … except to say that for those of
us who are long-time vegans, any concerns we might have had about
safety-of-diet vanished long ago. But, for new vegans, that assurance does have
to be established.
If you don’t know much about the
vegan diet it might seem like a frightening prospect, especially if you’ve been
mainly inspired by the ethics of it and are unsure of the safety angles. But
once you are assured of it, then the main danger is a social one, moving too
far away from others.
Like a reformed smoker, a vegan
can soon forget how he or she felt ‘before’ they became vegan, or how she/he no
longer misses their favourite (animal) foods or fashionable leather shoes or other
commodities made from animals. Hopefully we’re wanting something quite
different. An established vegan wants most of all to continue feeling ‘clean’
(like the ex-smoker who now wants clean lungs). If we can ‘clean out’ animal
foods from our lives, that’ll make us feel pretty righteous and ten-to-one
we’ll start boasting about it. Eventually our veganism might become our reason to be. And if this gets to be too
big a part of our identity we start to become too narrow, as if we’ve only got one interest it soon shows up most
obviously in our ordinary talk with others. And that’s all a-okay of course …
until it turns sour, when it starts to be judgemental talk.
Our boycott is all and all.
That’s what we do. If nothing else vegans do this. But the reason we boycott must never be an excuse to go around judging people who don’t boycott; that would be
rather cynically using the ‘animals’ to inflate our own egoistic ambitions. By
talking ‘food’ and ‘values’ it’s easy to stray into disparaging ‘the meat
heads’ (at first, all good clean fun), until it’s obvious that we have a need
to do so.
Our excuse: we’re as frustrated
as hell, because no one’s listening or agreeing about how we feel about
animals. We’re frustrated because we have no power to change anything … so we
have to let it out by climbing on roof tops and shouting, “Look at what you are
doing”. But still no joy. No one takes notice. Free people won’t ‘look’ at
anything, especially if they’re ordered to. It’s always going to be a Mexican
standoff - whatever we feel about them, they’ll as surely feel about us. The
bottom line here is about how we come across.
Vegans might have some
justification to judge those who are not vegan, but that’s the very reason why
we shouldn’t.
If ‘we don’t judge them they
won’t judge us’. Restraint here shows that we aren’t interested in winning, but
in talking. We need no pistols-at-dawn.
Let’s say we go to the movies and
see this great inspiring film, during which we can feel our whole outlook
changing. It’s intoxicating stuff! The film ends and everyone goes home. We all
revert to business-as-usual and very soon we can’t even remember what it was
that inspired us, and we can barely recall what the film was about. There are
so many ideas and so much new information today we can’t rely on our immediate
first reactions to anything. I wonder how much currency any inspiration has
today and how long we can expect it to last. Unless it touches us very deeply.
I realise the idea of animals’
being incarcerated touched me deeply because of my own horror of being enclosed
in small spaces and my fear of invasive surgical procedures and my dislike of any
sort of violence. I can’t ever forget that farm animals have to face all of
this. And that’s really why I feel so passionate to see an end of the terrible
cruelties we inflict on farm animals.
No comments:
Post a Comment