1782:
If I think the animal thing
is sad and another person doesn’t, it says a lot about the wide range of human perception.
I might know a few more details which makes me more aware of the situation
farm-animals are in, but today almost every adult knows essentially how bad
things are for them. In these gulags they call farms, and in slaughterhouses,
conditions have to be blocked out of people's minds. While it's impossible for
some to do that, it's easily possible for others - I see things one way and
someone else sees the same thing in another way. What is of greatest importance
to one is entirely unimportant to another.
This is how a typical vegan
might see things: Animals are not so very different to us, they’re sentient,
they feel pain and suffer as we do whenever their well-being and life are under
threat.
This is how a typical
non-vegan might see things: Animals are not ‘sovereign beings’ but more like
'things', and therefore no one has the right to interfere with the owners of
these 'things'. Animal farmers contend that what they do with their animals is
no one else’s business. Animals are their property, and property is sacrosanct,
and that’s the law.
However, according to moral
law, the way we treat them shows us how uncaring we humans really are. Seeing
what we are allowing to happen to animals is rather like looking into the
mirror at ourselves. It's a huge wake up, or so you’d think. But over a long
period of time we humans have got used to our reflection. We hardly notice the
uglinesses we've grown to accept.
One of the most useful things
I possess is a table, which I made. I chose the wood, paid for it and did the
carpentry. I didn’t grow the tree but I feel I have the right to call this
table ‘my’ table. It’s my property. I can look after it, abuse it, even chop it
up. I don’t have to wonder how the table is feeling, or what it thinks about my
‘owning’ it because, of course, objects can’t ‘feel’ or ‘think’. Does that mean
I can treat my car, my bike, my table in any old way I please? Legally I can.
This must be how farmers
think about their ‘right’ to treat what’s theirs, in any way they choose, not
only their tractors but their ‘stock’. Animals are considered property (like my
table or my bike). They can be loved and nurtured or they can be exploited and
even destroyed. We deal with property as we please, with impunity (and legal
immunity). Farm animals are regarded, to all intents and purposes, as
inanimate: not without life but without the right to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment