1784:
Many humans don’t pay much attention to
developing a philosophical basis to their
lives, or at least they don’t stray too far into the world of original
thinking. These humans are inclined to focus on the interests of humans only
to the detriment of other life forms. I think they do it because it’s where the
applause is loudest, where their own way of thinking is most likely to be
confirmed.
To be loyal to our own species at the
expense of other species is anthropocentrism. We’d find it ridiculous, to say
that torturing humans is okay if it’s done humanely, torture never being
‘humanely’ administered. But we have a different set of rules when it comes to non-humans
and how they can be treated. One could say that lacto-ovo vegetarians
accept the humane torture of animals, because the animals from which
eggs and milk are taken are not killed for their meat. It’s okay to exploit
them, take their babies, exhaust them, prematurely age them and keep them in
confinement with no semblance of social or sexual life until they’re of no
further use to humans. Their by-products are acceptable to the lacto-ovo-vegetarian,
as long as their flesh is not actually eaten. If they don’t eat meat they can
still call themselves vegetarians. Their hypocrisy is astounding.
Here, with the laying hen and the dairy
cow, are examples of grossly abused animals. A dairy cow who ‘gives’ her milk,
means that her milk is denied to her calf, who is then disposed of. The dairy
cow is finally executed when her milk production drops below a certain
level. The hen who ‘gives’ us her eggs (the
male chicks are killed on day one) is finally executed, and so is the sheep who
‘gives’ us the wool from its back (exposing it to sunburn and exposure).
They’re sent to their grisly deaths after they’ve given as much as they can
give. Each of these animals lives in appalling conditions and is slaughtered at
the abattoir when they can no longer provide enough milk, eggs or wool,
respectively.
Could any fair-weather vegetarian
say they do not approve of killing animals for human convenience?
No comments:
Post a Comment