Friday, May 6, 2016

First freeze your lobster, then take a sharp knife ...

1702:    

Despite a certain wave of change taking place today, it's still fashionable to be 'unaware' of the conditions in which farmed animals live and die. Fashion says it’s okay to eat meat, to wear wool, to buy fashionable shoes made of leather, to eat eggs for breakfast and take cow’s milk in your coffee. But what about the big food temptations, the salivation stimulators, the rich foods, the treat foods, and the exotic foods like lobster or wagyu beef? Or simple mouth-watering confections which contain cruelty-based ingredients? By deciding to buy any of these tempting items, we implicate ourselves in cruelty and atrocity. Could there be anything more atrocious than visiting a tank in a restaurant, and asking the waiter to bring you "that" (present-living lobster - which must of course must be violently dispatched before being steamed)?

At that most private moment, as you are standing at the 'lobster tank' or at the shop counter, you are imagining the taste of this lobster. You've decided to buy it, and it's likely you won’t be considering the rights and wrongs of your purchase - you refuse to deny yourself the most exquisite taste-pleasure money can buy.

For children, things are different. For them such choices don't have to be made. But for them choosing is denied anyway, in most important ways. I don't mean choosing what lollies they want, I mean choosing the ethics they'll need, to guide them through their lives. Most often, the family regime is imposed directly or subliminally - many of the foods the kids might want are, in practical home-rules' terms, unattainable. But as we grow up and we have freer choice, we’re faced with a new fear -‘missing out’. The time is narrow, and we are young men and young women for only a short period. We choose to live our lives to the full, and enjoy whatever we want. So, it would seem strange to deny ourselves anything simply based on ethics. Even the mildest consideration of 'ethics' would inhibit our delicious freedom-of-choice.

 But this is exactly what many people are doing - making a conscious decision not to buy. "I no longer eat meat, fish or fowl", we might say. But we can be tricky with ourselves. If we want something badly enough we’ll pretend a 'lightweight' ignorance. Particularly in the supermarket when we fail to check the ingredients list. And then we're able to eat what we like. BUT we end up eating what we actually disapprove of. Since there's no one checking up on us (whether parents for kids or vegans for adults) there's no pressure to ‘do the right thing’. We can avoid knowing, for there's only Conscience left that could be calling the shots.


Imagine what life must be like for our consciences, becoming ever more disabled, disconnected and discarded. Today there's so much to object to that our conscience is a barely heard voice.  We've trained it to be weak, which is why vegans have to spell out something we shouldn't have to - a ‘non-use-of-animals’ standard. And if we do have to, then we must do it as nicely as possible - vegans have to speak loudly (and softly) to get others to think things through for themselves, so they can come to their own conclusions with a newly reinstalled conscience.

No comments: