1690:
You might have seen it
already, but if you haven't, there's a local newspaper here in Sydney, the
North Shore Times - it's front page had a picture of seven teenage girls from
Pymble Ladies College standing in front of two steers who they raised, and
named Lionel and Lenny. You can see on the girls' faces a beaming smile that
would melt your heart. The only trouble is that Lenny and Lionel are no longer
alive. In fact, along with a man in the photograph (presumably the butcher) the
animals are now just two sad carcasses, each hanging by their legs on hooks. Are
these girls being introduced to the butchering trade? I doubt if these girls
would be smiling so brightly if they'd had to slaughter their two friends.
Some children can be
brainwashed into thinking that animals should be turned into meat. Does that
mean they can love them when alive and in a different way still love them, as
meat? Does it mean that they can erase from their minds the intervening process
at the abattoir? Are these girls expected to imagine their friends being
slaughtered 'humanely', without experiencing the killing for themselves?
To let these girls see
their friends being killed would be considered by their teachers and parents to
be far too disturbing for children. So how suggestible are these girls, and
what exactly has been suggested to them? Probably, they've been told
that killing animals is essential if they want to continue eating them. That
might sound fair enough, but if we follow that line of logic through, we arrive at a point where violence is acceptable when
it fulfils a need and presumably in this case, meat is a 'need'. Could we
then go one step further and say that sexual intercourse is a valid 'need' for
male soldiers. So when they're denied the company of their women folk, it's
quite acceptable for them to find women and girls and rape them? It fulfils a
need, as meat does, and justifies the violence against the innocent, be they
vulnerable animals or vulnerable humans.
PS - A copy of this blog
has been sent to the Principal of PLC with an accompanying letter
No comments:
Post a Comment