1138:
By avoiding animal products,
by becoming vegan, it’s likely that we’ll come to feel good about our decision.
The stomach feels more comfortable,
conscience lighter and brain sharper.
But this question of ‘good’,
what is it? And especially what does it
feel like when we are doing things ‘for the greater good’?
We might be
altruistically-intentioned, not acting for our self only. Maybe we miss out on
some immediate pleasure that we want. But we’re sowing seeds that are going to
flower later - however, working for the greater good might mean that the
results don’t show up till after we are dead.
It might be like that with
Animals Rights. Perhaps it aims at an
end-product, in the form of a set of changes taking place in the human psyche,
and later being enacted on a mass scale. Animals-being-liberated might not come about
until certain other preliminaries are put into place. And it’s likely those
will take time - again, perhaps after many of us are dead.
So, today is not about
impatiently chasing change but about laying foundation stones for future
change. From the point of view of ‘The
Greater Good’, it’s essential we act now for the sake of the future. The altruistic element of that is both
selfless and selfish, the latter, so we can start to ‘feel-good’ about
ourselves from now on.
If we’re not interested in
long term planning, it probably means that we don’t care about what’s coming
(“I won’t be around to see it”). We
won’t be interested in the concept of
altruism. It will be meaningless. Instead, self-image will be more important - seeming to be good. We might think the show is the important
thing. But it’s fairly obvious to the onlooker that by displaying ‘goodness’ at
every conceivable opportunity we’re merely bragging.
At the other extreme is a
person with genuine humility who does, overall, a much better job. But in the end, it’s the depth of our
commitment (to being good) which will eventually be tested. The safeguard is anonymity. By not boasting we’re safer, but less
visible. That might not sit well with
the activist, with their need to protect animals and make a show of their
abstentions and passions. They might
choose to take a more antagonistic, direct approach. Their passion is connected to deep emotions,
like outrage, compassion, sensitivity, hatred, being right and being
righteously confident. But by taking the
high moral ground, we can’t necessarily take ourselves out of the picture. And that will be obvious to those we are
trying to impress, and it’s likely that we’ll achieve the very opposite of what
we want, to win their sympathy for our point of view.
No comments:
Post a Comment