599:
Disapproval seems like a common weapon we use when we’re
badly pissed off about something. Vegans don’t like what we see and we don’t
like being silenced, and therefore we also don’t like the omnivore’s
intolerance of us. In turn, we disapprove of them and, in return, they hit back
... and so it goes, in circles. Vegans have to break that circle, take a lead,
hard though it be.
I’m always disappointed,
along with other animal activists, that we aren’t making enough impact. But as
a body we’re divided along classical lines, as to how far we go and what to
emphasise. Some want total- others partial-non-use of animals. Added to this,
we’re divided over what approach to take, when talking ‘animals’. There are
those who go in hard and there are those who favour the softer approach. The
most outraged and bravest vegans initially go ‘hard-on’, mainly to impress
their colleagues and show themselves how determined and committed they are.
Later the cracks appear in the fabric of our ‘hard-on’ approach.
But then
how effective is the other way? How does it look to our co-activists, being a ‘softy’?
Or how effective is it in the ‘attacking-of-sensibilities’ stakes? How
effective do you think you are, that’s the ultimate question after all, how
effective, whenever you get into the thick of this subject?
Vegans know
very well what they want from people, that The People will rise up against
misinformation and dangerous food products. We want the Many Others to come to
their senses. But most people aren’t in that sort of mood, just yet. They can’t
see the bigger picture they’re part of, or drop the traditional foods they like
to eat. Nor can they know at this time in their personal lives, that at each step
away from a conventional mind-set there’s a
subtle-at-first-but-later-so-obvious realisation, that from every point onwards
discomfort lessens.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, things could hardly be going
better for the purveyors of animal-based products, knowing that customers will
always demand yummy foods.
All we
vegans can do is promote cruelty-free products ... and encourage people to
boycott animal products. The odds are against us because of the high price of
imported goods, which have to be brought into this country (Australia) because
there isn’t a big enough market to warrant them being produced here. If you
want a Mars Bar you pay $1 at Woolworths. The equivalent cruelty-free bar is
four times the price. Cruelty-free products are priced for the smaller-market,
and that’s the big problem for many of us on limited incomes. But little by
little, as the cruelty-free companies grow and can reduce prices and sell more,
the wheel will turn. In the meantime we have to keep pushing on and (small
price to pay) learn to do-without, because of this on-going problem, finding
that vegan alternatives simply aren’t available.
Presently
the animal industries are enjoying raking it in. They know what customers want
and how much they’ll tolerate to get it. But as health concerns and moral
outrage increases, so the idea of alternative food regimens might then come to
be more widely considered.
No comments:
Post a Comment