Sunday, June 28, 2015

Energy maximising


1406: 

Maybe as vegans we’re convinced about our arguments concerning animal slavery, even though we know that arguing our case is going to be a long, drawn-out, David and Goliath affair.  The odds might seem stacked against us and the tide not turning our way as quickly as we’d like, but we mustn’t be afraid of energy loss from our efforts made.
         
We might spend time fretting over our ineffectiveness, so we might try to steal energy from other commitments. But then something else goes short – our relationships get stretched.  There’s never enough time to do anything else well.  We are torn between doing more for Animal Rights and spending less time with family and friends.
         
The original idea of Animal Rights is totally inspiring.  Too interesting.  Eventually it makes a call on our energies – doing whatever we can to get closer to solving the mystery of communicating this difficult subject.  We try to boost our energy by reading.  It serves to confirm how important this subject is, and from what we read we head off with renewed energy.  We look at video footage, listen to speakers, discuss with our fellow activists.  We do whatever it takes to keep up the passion and outrage.

But there’s a balance to be struck.  If we let Animal Rights work interfere with our personal life, things may start to go wrong with our energy balance.  Where is all this extra energy we need supposed to come from?  Certainly we’re well endowed with it from the vegan food we eat. We aren’t any longer sluggish from eating crap food and stodge.  But mostly, we need motive energy, and that comes from the sheer significance of what we are trying to achieve.  So, it’s crucial to maintain a balance between personal life and activist work but to get extra energy wherever we can find it.  And this isn’t always very easy.  The burn-out rate amongst animal activists is frightening.

If energy is a problem, maybe we have to re-think energy, as to what it is and what type of energy we are most in need of.  To start with, we need to consider energy not as a finite resource, like having so much petrol in the tank to run our machine, but more like a self perpetuating resource - energy out-put generating an in-put of energy.  Motivational energy, for such meaningful work, must become a type of energy that expands as it expends.
         
Let’s say that acts of usefulness or kindness, where there’s big investment on our part, may show little reward in terms of achievement but show surprisingly little energy depletion.  Perhaps activism uses the sort of energy where the more we use the more is replaced.
         
I find it works that way.  As soon as I let go self interest, the stronger the energy flow is.  Could it be that when energy is released for the ‘greater-good’ that we set off a chain reaction?   For instance, as soon as we begin to take an interest in a forest, an animal, a human or any important global issue, that the energy we need will appear, as if from nowhere?  Maybe the opposite happens too, where self-interest drains our energy.  Perhaps that’s the reason why the insatiable thirst of the greedy fits so well into the ‘more greed, more need’ pattern.


If energy supply really does work like this (harmful sources like meat depleting energy, harmless sources like plant food are efficient energy suppliers) it puts a new spin on things - that however hard pressed we feel, there’s always going to be enough energy for any meaningful activities.

No comments: