Friday, April 19, 2013

The low empathy quotient


696:

My first instinct is to leap to the defence of animals, because they so badly need defending. Then I realize it involves a long ‘to-do’ list on my part. There’s the rub. I realize I’m setting myself up for a fall. Giving up items of food and clothing because of the animals. And if I can do without, how long for?
By being perpetually overwhelmed with such a long list I can’t decide what needs most attention, what to give up and what to retain. Or rather, I ask myself the question, what is achievable? How can I ration-out my reserves of ‘care’ without completely depleting myself and then giving up the whole project?
The Animal Rights Movement is all about maintaining high ideals. Many of us become drained by trying to achieve them because just by facing the issues it takes a lot of energy. So, which issues do I take up? For animal activists there’s always a danger of spreading ourselves too thinly and pleasing nobody, least of all ourselves. But in prioritizing there’s a danger of putting too much onto the ‘back burner’, and then letting some issues become permanently forgotten about. So while I want to be consistent, knowing that no animal is more important than any other, it grieved me to think how inconsistent I could be. Most of the animal welfare and animal rights groups specialise on one or two main issues and ignore ‘lesser’ issues.
It isn’t only a matter of taking up animal issues, there are people involved here, at the production end and at the customer end. To deal with animal issues we have to deal with people issues at the same time. Perhaps it’s most important to understand other people’s difficulties, concerning their own use of animals. For us, we need to see how the whole ethical confusion is a worry to many people, about the use of animals in our society.
For me, understanding others lack of empathy starts with looking at what empathy involves. If I wonder why others are inconsistent I have to look at my own inconsistency. For example, when I see the homeless man on the streets at night, I tell myself that I’ve already got plenty to care about, so I don’t want to take on more. I pretend not to notice him; I pretend NOT to notice what I know I HAVE noticed. It’s the same with the way most people choose NOT to see the animals behind the food they’re eating. They know that chickens and pigs suffer badly, but they also know they are just like their dogs and cats at home, that they have the same sorts of feelings and suffer the same pain when it’s inflicted, yet they treat one as unlovable and the other as loveable. The homeless man is just as deserving of love as my closest friend and yet I’m able to ignore him completely. Is that just one of the absurdities I’ve got to learn to live with? Charity starts at home, but it often stays there! The fact is that our fellow humans don’t yet regard all sensitive and sentient creatures as of equal importance to each other or, of course, to humans. They favour some with an abundance of kindness and care, and totally ignore others and support their exploitation. 

No comments: