Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Cruelty and temptation


24.

If we are animal eaters, we support animal cruelty, whether we like it or not! If we’re at all concerned, then we have to balance our own wants against the cost to the animals themselves. If we don’t care about the feelings of animals then it’s likely we are not to be trusted around any animals at all, since the use and abuse of them is always going to be too tempting. We’re always going to be considering our own interests before theirs. Even the most beloved companion animals at home may prove this point. When their medical treatment incurs high veterinary bills some can’t pay and some can but won’t and have their animals’ lives brought to an early end for their own convenience.
            Perhaps it’s here that we’re most sorely tested – the animal we say we love presents us with a difficult choice between the outlay of a considerable sum of money and the saving of the beloved animal’s life. For some it will always be compassion that decides. For others even the kennelling costs whilst away on holiday convince them to have their animal put down, to be replaced by another on their return. 
             Those animals that are used for food are entirely beyond consideration since we are taught to feel no responsibility for what happens to them. So long as we don’t know too much about their living conditions or the manner of their death, we can enjoy the ‘benefit’ of them. Since almost all of us do it, there’s hardly anyone left to put pressure on us to change.
These farmed, faceless animals are not only very available (when dead), but as everyone knows are so tasty to eat and a good source of protein. Surely, we argue, we’d be mad not to accept Nature’s generous bounty? Since no animal can match a human’s strength and brain power we know there’s no danger of them fighting back. They make easy prey for us and once we’ve enslaved them, they become rather like food-on-tap. We can regulate the timing of their lives and deaths and therefore make efficient use of them, to the fullest extent. Most people have never considered the possibility that this traditional use of animals is wrong.
            Those of us who are more kindly disposed towards animals might want to make our disagreement known. But does that mean we must avoid all animal food? If so, does that mean we will starve or become ill by not eating meat or animal by-products?
            Up until the middle of the last century, this was the common belief; that animal protein was nutritionally essential and without meat our health would be compromised - we’d become anaemic, lack physical and mental energy and our children would sicken. By the second half of the twentieth century this belief was exploded by a few brave people who experimented with avoiding all animal protein, finding that the human body actually thrived on a plant-based diet. From that point, everything began to change, for a significant number of people. Now it was possible, if it suited us, to take on a different regime of eating where there was no danger to our health by not eating animals. Indeed, we were at last realising that humans do not need to depend on animals for anything - transport, clothing, entertainment or food. We would be able to regard animals as sovereign, irreplaceable individuals and allow them to live out their lives without human interference. And yet as free-willed human beings, we still had the ‘choice’ and it seemed that for the overwhelming majority, making use of animals was still too tempting to give up.

No comments: