2088:
As animal advocates, our
number one aim should be to never get nasty or never to be insistent. The
seriousness of the (animal) issue isn’t necessarily shared by everyone, so the details
I might want to ‘share’ with you should be kept in reserve. Use them when
we can use them effectively.
When, for instance, we are
sure we have their interest, their attention, and maybe even their affection,
then we can talk. Probably not before!
Once they show interest (and
we are watching for any signs of un-interest) it’s all fine. Go-ahead. We say
what needs to be said and move on. But if there’s NO interest then talking
about animal issues is a waste of breath, and we’re also likely to be offending
them. Communication breaks down most often because we are stepping too quickly
into one of my favourite subjects. In
our case, animals or diet. Immediately a sensitive subject is alluded to, then warning
lights predict something ‘boring’ is coming up. But instead of showing that big-yawn-boring-ness,
there is a polite nodding of the head, and an encouraging benevolence towards
the mention of that reverent subject, but the talking-about-which we’re not
happy.
So, because we are dishonest (not
wanting to hurt feelings, etc) we do polite. We show accepting-ness. We’re
certainly not expressing our feelings – if that person is offended or embarrassed
they won’t show it. Therefore we
fail to notice it. And we carry on talking as if they want to hear what we’ve got to say, whereas they are wanting us to stop.
No comments:
Post a Comment