1768:
The public stick together.
They have a way of not responding to the animal-horror stories. But if vegans
feel anger towards the farmers and killers and retailers of animals, we might
be missing the point. We can’t persuade those who make their daily living out
of animals. We’ll surely have greater success, albeit slow, with members of the
general public. And not with anger but with irresistible arguments aimed at
this target audience. When you consider how much damage the consumers do with
their purchasing of unethical products, perhaps they should be confronted about
their shopping choices, to move them towards some consciousness raising.
Consciousness is very
subjective. The ordinary Joe doesn’t think of himself as an omnivore. The
ordinary Jo hasn’t given much thought to where her meat or milk comes from. All
they know is that there are a few people, who call themselves ‘vegans’, who
feel strongly about eating animals. If you see someone you know to be a vegan
walking towards you, you can cross to the other side of the street or simply
ignore what they are saying. Or you can do what so many others do - out of a
need to lessen their guilt, they might choose to make this into a health issue.
They pretend confusion about meat and milk as being “possibly” unhealthy, thus
neatly avoiding the “possibility” of the food being unethical. Most omnivores
can handle doing something that’s not healthy but can’t accept that they’re
doing something morally wrong. It’s very difficult for your regular nice guy to
condone the killing of animals. They might concede agreement that veggies are
healthier, if only to divert attention away from any talk about caging and
killing.
This ‘cruelty’ aspect is hard
to face if you support it by what you buy. But for other reasons, for us, this
is a sensitive subject to broach. But we also know that if we can get this
aspect across, we start to make the biggest impact. By emphasising empathy and
sensitivity and softening of attitudes, rather than adopting a healthy diet of
plants, we touch a raw nerve. Which is why we hardly ever get any of this
across. People are on the defensive when they are in danger of meeting a vegan
and talking animals with them.
Since this is not a police state
(and we are not ‘vegan police’), we have to wait for them to see what we’ve seen. Only then might they respond
to the hard facts the way we’ve done. Maybe, you and I were deeply moved by
pictures of struggling animals facing death; perhaps we changed our own way of
eating in response to these sorts of images, of say a terror-stricken lamb
being manhandled into the killing chute or male chicks being thrown into the
mincer. Maybe people are similarly moved. But more likely at the first
realisation of what was about to be shown the brain sends out a warning to
avoid seeing these sorts of indelible images. It’s too upsetting. And whether
it’s an image or the words contained in a vegan’s arguments, we are primed to
expect danger and impelled to avoid it. To cross the road. Which is why vegans
often feel alienated, rejected, lonely and hardly ever experience success in
their advocacy for Animal Rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment