1311:
A new world seems to be
arriving, one that is post holocaust, post atomic bomb, post factory farm and
post animal experimentation - it is a prospective world of peace. It suggests something very brave indeed - that
we might be ready to give peace a chance. But presently, the world is too violent for
such ideals to survive for very long, let alone grow strong. The human mind still works in a clumsy way
when it comes to ethics - a first question leads to the absurdity of a second
question - don’t we still need some violence to survive? and don’t we need to
use some violence to force people to accept peace?
And this is how it plays out
for those of us attempting to raise awareness, of both social justice and the
rights of animals. Perhaps it goes
something like this: I must hit people hard with the facts, to make them sit up
and take notice. In order to survive in this harsh world, I must be pragmatic
and not too idealistic. Surely, there’s
nothing wrong with some violence? (Can you hear some faint cheering from the
lacto-ovo-vegetarians?)
This line of thinking
deteriorates into something like this: If I get a bit rough with the kids they'll
learn not to take advantage of my kindness. If they fear punishment they won’t run riot. Or: A few harsh words to my next door
neighbour will keep his noisy music quiet. If he doesn’t like what I say, too bad! Without a little assertiveness I won’t achieve
the results I want. I just want a bit of
peace. (Which is not quite the same as giving
peace a chance!)
Why do we start to think
along these mutated lines? Perhaps we accept that we have to have some rules,
some punishment, some violence, to make this whole difficult world operate. And we know all this because the authorities
have taught us that way. When we are young
we follow the accepted way. We follow
without question. Educational and
religious institutions show us how double standards work. For example, they may say that it is okay to exploit
animals because they are a major resource at our disposal, and it would be a
pity to waste this resource; if everyone stopped using them it would threaten
the stability of our society. The
indoctrination of children is essential, and to this end, it is important to
keep the connection between animal treatment and violence away from them, since
they mustn’t know what really happens to the animals they’re going to be eating
for the rest of their lives. So far
we've drifted a long way from giving peace a chance.
We like John Lennon and we
like the song, but we think it just applies to war. It's simpler to think this way. And for the rest of the violence-saturated
world we live in, it's better that we just follow 'the rules' and do as we've
been taught. Society determines the moral
codes we must abide by. And admittedly,
we might think they seem a bit dodgy, but we're told that the alternative is anarchy
- just imagine how dangerous it would be if we tried to make up our own rules
of right and wrong, based on instinct. Imagine if we all started to apply such
instincts to daily life. For a start, it would play havoc with the food
industry. The abattoirs would go broke.
In our Western world, during
the 1960s, there were a lot of people beginning to think independently. They dared to reject what they'd been taught,
because they saw how Society's moral codes were falling apart. The counter-culture laughed at the moral codes
of the day. The morality bubble began to
burst, but unfortunately the baby was thrown out with the bathwater. Nothing was certain, and revolution was
everywhere. Everything was being thrown into doubt. No one could make confident
choices or launch new attitudes. Only the superficial things changed, whilst the
fundamentals remained in tact.
Fifty years on our choices
are more confident, and we don’t need to refer to Society for our codes of
conduct. We apply our own codes to
relationships, eating habits and how heavily we choose to tread on the Earth. In this way we are broadening our definition
and application of peace. And only now, we're
on the threshold of giving peace a chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment