936:
There are two different approaches to healing, one is environmental
the other ethical. They sit alongside each other, almost under the same banner.
They each have something important to say about the state of human well-being
and about the kind of world we want to live in. I might emphasise ethics, you
might emphasise the state of (human and environmental) health. Each of us is
looking for something convincing, to carry us beyond the damage brought about
by modern day living.
The reason
I consider animal abuse as the most urgent issue is that until this is fixed
nothing much else can move on. I’d prioritise this.
With a different emphasis, there
are those who promote healthy diets and enlightened spiritual practices. They
have a wonderful vision, and I’d go along with it entirely, but since they
aren’t vegan, they effectively condone the cruel treatment of animals. It’s
impossible to get around that. You can’t pray for peace wearing leather shoes!
The great tragedy of those who
are on the road to enlightenment is that they don’t put their money where their
mouth is, and therefore can’t be taken too seriously. They speak of peace and
love, of sustainability and healthy eating, but their food is neither healthy
nor sustainable and their lifestyle disproves their words of love and peace.
The abattoir castes a dark shadow over the lives of most of us. However
holistic or gentle one’s approach to life might be, if private and personal
habits run counter to the principles one espouses, then it all counts for
nothing. It simply means that one isn’t as completely convinced of peace and
love as one would like to believe.
The first step on the road to
healing starts when we take a look at the abattoir and say, “This is not for
me”.
No comments:
Post a Comment