895:
If I said to you, “What I want for myself I also want for others”,
would you say that’s altruistic or unrealistic? I feel a bit stuck with the old
meaning of altruism, with its very ‘Western-Christian-Good-Bad’ associations.
But somehow it’s some form of altruism that might just turn this whole thing around,
with animals.
If we can
get into the habit of doing something regularly that is not selfishly
motivated, we get practice in generating our own satisfactions. If we can find
satisfaction in empathising, that will lead us to consider the feelings of
animals. And once we are empathising, absorbing information about the
conditions animals are being kept in, then we can move from having contempt for
them to feeling affection for them. It’s the difference between indifference and
caring. I wouldn’t say I love animals nor describe myself as an animal lover,
but it grieves me that so many are banged up in jail, with only an ugly death
to look forward to.
Now, you
may argue that they don’t know their fate. But what if they do? What if, even
at that moment before death, they understand the extent to which they’ve been
betrayed?
Perhaps it
will trouble us, that we participate in enslaving animals, since I’ve never met
anyone who would actually want to cause any animal any harm, and have it on their
conscience. Science has shown us it’s unnecessary to use ANY animals for either
food or clothing, so by ignoring that science and following social custom, we let
emotion and convenience do our deciding for us - to NOT change our attitude to
animals. We prefer to have contempt for these sheep and cows and pigs and
chickens, not love or affection. Such is the power of food satisfaction! Such
is the fear of making changes to our attitudes.
No comments:
Post a Comment