831:
We vegans could seem like a threat to people’s peace of
mind, but since vegans are in such small numbers at the moment, we’re still
rather ignore-able. (In most countries veganism is hardly known about at all).
Here in Australia it’s rarely mentioned in the media and for most people the
whole idea of animals having rights is a completely foreign if not laughable
idea. Gradually things may change, who knows? At present though, the general
attitude towards veganism is either to find it incomprehensible or a vague
threat to one’s own lifestyle. Possibly it’s even a subject that’s dangerous
for impressionable young minds.
Any threat
veganism poses isn’t physical of course but it can be somehow disturbing all
the same, because it touches on everything all at once; any impact it makes, it
makes deeply. For example, we argue that animal slavery can be related to just
about every violence-based activity whether it damages the human body, the
environment or the lives of animals. Any threat vegans pose isn’t physical of
course but we can be somehow disturbing all the same; if we do make an impact
we make it deeply. For example, we make the connections between animal slavery
and illness, global warming, world starvation and many other central issues,
while most people are collaborating with destructive forces simply by remaining
omnivorous.
The central
question is about whether humans are innately destructive in their primary
attitude to the world, and whether this can be justified.
We live the
way we do today in laboratory conditions of our own making. We’re almost
desperate to find out if we, humans, are worth saving. Does it mean that we,
despite our brilliant discoveries, have gone too far? Have we destroyed too
much to deserve to be spared? Maybe that’s not a useful question, except that
it points to the need for a solution - the principle of repair through a
concerted act of non-violence, which cancels out the violence which has caused
the problems in the first place.
Vegans are
presenting compassion as a principle that is still being shunned by the world
at large. It’s neat because it’s incontrovertible (and that makes people
hostile towards it because it shows them to have been wrong).
Compassion
theory is obviously making its mark. We care about things we didn’t care much
about fifty years ago. We care for trees and threatened species. We care about
the planet. We care about taking children’s views into consideration, we show
concern for the troubled worlds outside our own comfortable world. But
‘compassion’ (heart-intelligence) seems an obvious threat to the macho status
quo.
No comments:
Post a Comment