687:
In this present day society, we are guided
less by ethics and more by economics. From a need for food-energy comes the idea
that high-energy-food comes from animals, and that if we want to enjoy the
advantage of this sort of energy, then
its production must be economically viable. If that is accepted we take the
next step, that it must be okay for ‘food’ animals to be held captive for their
whole life and kept virtually immobilized to maximize their energy-giving
properties. The poultry sheds and cattle feedlots are testament to that logic,
in that they depend for their success on restricting the animal’s bodily
movements, to make their fattening more efficient. Nothing else makes economic
sense.
The
typical intensive system must go unremarked if we want cheap meat, cheap eggs
and cheap milk! There must be tacit public approval for treating animals in
this ‘necessarily atrocious’ way, and that approval is given in return for
product being made available and affordable.
No comments:
Post a Comment