650:
There are two different approaches, marching alongside each
other, almost under the same banner – they each have something important to say
about the state of human health and ethics. The rationale behind each approach
might be all very interesting, but who amongst us has the time to contemplate ideas
when, apart from health & ethics, there’s so much else to learn about, like
the state of the planet, the quarrels between nations and the current state of
one’s relationships?
If I
consider the animal abuse issue to be central I will prioritise that and want
everyone else to lay aside other issues to prioritise that too. As a proponent
of these issues, knowing as I do, quite a lot about animals and farming and the
general wickedness of people in relation to animals, I will heavily promote
veganism. But in the opposite camp there are some very bright cookies who
promote something distinctly different. They are the healers. No, not the vegan
healers, the non-vegan ones who are advocating from an entirely different basis,
as proponents of ‘healthy’ diets or spiritual practices. They have wonderful
wisdoms to impart. All of us could gain so much by listening to them, but by their
not yet being vegan themselves they expose themselves to being taken not entirely
seriously. They speak highly of peace and love, of sustainability and eating
good quality foods. They are admired for their holistic and gentle approach but
unfortunately they are laughed at for how they are in private, their habits and
the way in which those habits run counter to the principles they espouse. Just
by what they spend their money on they show that they aren’t as completely
convinced of the peace and love principle as they say they are.
No comments:
Post a Comment